The Buffalo News

Sunday, November 8, 2009

Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
subscribe now

Operator of ill-fated Flight 3407 under scrutiny on rules for cockpit, adequacy of training

FAA probes Colgan on pilot overscheduling

NEWS WASHINGTON BUREAU CHIEF

Story tools:

Copyright 2009 The Buffalo News

WASHINGTON—The Federal Aviation Administration is investigating whether Colgan Air — which operated the Continental Connection commuter plane that crashed in Clarence Center on Feb. 12 — violated federal rules by overscheduling its pilots.

Meanwhile, sources said the National Transportation Safety Board’s investigation of the crash is increasingly focusing on Colgan’s pilot-training program, particularly pertaining to how the plane’s stall-protection system operates in icing conditions.

Revelations about the FAA and safety board investigations come a week before the board begins a three-day hearing into the Clarence Center crash.

The board previously listed “fatigue management” and “stall recovery training” as factors that it was studying as it searched for a probable cause for the crash of Continental Connection Flight 3407, which claimed 50 lives, including one on the ground.

At this point, however, it is unclear whether the FAA investigation is connected in any way to the Clarence Center crash.

“A small number” of Colgan pilots and the airline itself have received letters of investigation from the FAA, the Colgan pilots union said in an April 20 memo to its members that never mentions the Buffalo-area crash.

Agency officials have audited Colgan pilot schedules dating from last November, and “through this process they have identified a small group of pilots who, they believe, have violated flight-time or duty-time regulations,” said the memo, which was obtained by The Buffalo News.

Current FAA regulations say pilots can fly for no more than eight out of every 24 hours, provided the pilot has had at least eight continuous hours of rest during that 24-hour period. And if that rest period is less than nine hours, the pilot’s next rest period must be lengthened to compensate.

Airlines that violate those regulations can be subjected to civil fines. For example, American Airlines was fined $285,000 in the wake of such violations in 2001. Pilots, meanwhile, can be suspended for breaking those rules.

The Colgan pilots memo offers no indication of how that airline or its pilots might have violated those regulations, and it urges pilots who have received the letter to contact their union representative.

Laura Brown, an FAA spokeswoman, said she could not comment on or confirm any such investigation.

Joe Williams, a spokesman for Pinnacle Airlines, which owns Colgan, said: “Colgan and our pilots operate in full accordance with federal aviation regulations. There have been no, nor do we expect any, enforcement actions against any of our pilots. Any additional questions should be addressed to the FAA.”

Meanwhile, the National Transportation Safety Board investigation of the Clarence Center crash is raising questions about an unusual feature of the Bombardier Dash 8 Q400 aircraft’s stall-protection system — and whether the crew of the doomed plane was properly trained to know how that system worked in icing conditions.

At issue is the plane’s “REF speeds” switch, a toggle in the cockpit that aims to account for the fact that planes stall at a higher rate of speed when they have ice on their wings.

When the REF, or reference speed, switch is set on “INCR,” the stall-warning system will activate at a speed that’s about 20 knots higher than it would when it is in the off position.

Sources said the switch was in the “INCR” or increase position on Flight 3407, as it should have been—although the crew might not have known that this would activate the stall-warning system much more quickly than normal.

“Unless you were trained in this maneuver, it would take you aback,” said Donald L. McCune Jr., a pilot and attorney with Motley Rice LLC who represents the National Air Disaster Alliance in its lawsuit against the federal government over supposed lack of action on airplane icing. “It would happen so much more quickly than you were used to.”

Most planes don’t include an REF switch and instead automatically adjust the stall-warning speed based on the presence of ice on the wing, rather than ratcheting it up by an arbitrary 20 knots, McCune said.

Asked for a description of the operations of the REF speed switch, a spokesman for the plane’s manufacturer, Bombardier Aerospace of Toronto, declined to comment.

“It’s possible this issue will come up at next week’s public hearings; with that, we believe it’s wrong to enter into a dialogue that has the potential to feed speculation on the cause of the tragedy,” said the Bombardier spokesman, John R. Arnone.

The safety board investigation of the crash has increasingly focused on possible pilot error, and either fatigue or inadequate training could prove to be a reason behind any such mistake.

In its last news release on the Clarence Center crash, the safety board said the plane’s stall-warning device — called the “stick shaker” — activated as the plane was approaching the Buffalo area and traveling at a speed of 130 knots, “which is consistent with the de-icing system being engaged.”

After the stick shaker activated, the pilot pulled back on the plane’s yoke, causing the twin-engine turboprop plane to suddenly jerk upward before spinning out of control.

Several aviation experts previously told The News that this appears to be a fatal error on the part of the crew. The proper response to a stall is to lower the plane’s nose to recover airspeed, increase the power and level the wings, rather than to pull the plane’s nose upward.

The plane’s pilot, Capt. Marvin D. Renslow, and co-pilot, Rebecca Lynn Shaw, died in the crash.

Renslow, 47, had just started flying the Q400 the previous December and had accumulated 109 flight hours on the plane. Shaw, 24, had flown 772 hours in the aircraft.

jzremski@buffnews.com


Reader comments

There on this article.
Rate This Article
Reader comments are posted immediately and are not edited. Users can help promote good discourse by using the "Inappropriate" links to vote down comments that fall outside of our guidelines. Comments that exceed our moderation threshold are automatically hidden and reviewed by an editor. Comments should be on topic; respectful of other writers; not be libelous, obscene, threatening, abusive, or otherwise offensive; and generally be in good taste. Users who repeatedly violate these guidelines will be banned. Comments containing objectionable words are automatically blocked. Some comments may be re-published in The Buffalo News print edition.

Log into MyBuffalo to post a comment





What is MyBuffalo?
MyBuffalo is the new social network from Buffalo.com. Your MyBuffalo account lets you comment on and rate stories at buffalonews.com. You can also head over to mybuffalo.com to share your blog posts, stories, photos, and videos with the community. Join now or learn more.
sort comments:

Buffalo News Video


Breaking News Video

Breaking 24 Hour News

more >>

Most Viewed Stories, Last 24 Hours