Skip to Main Navigation

The Buffalo News

Web Search
by YAHOO! SEARCH

State set to get tax on Indian cigarette sales

News Staff Reporters

Published:May 9, 2011, 12:52 PM

Font Size:
  • E-mail
  • Share
  • Print

Updated: May 10, 2011, 9:23 AM

 A ruling Monday by a federal appeals court prompted state officials to begin planning to collect taxes on cigarette sales from Indians to non-Indian customers.

The effort announced by Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo sets up a potential confrontation between the state and Native Americans who call the taxation an assault on their sovereignty and economic well-being.

The state Tax Department was expected to post tax-collection guidelines on its website Monday night -- the first legal step for what Cuomo administration officials said will be an immediate requirement that wholesalers charge the state's $4.35-per-pack excise tax on every pack of cigarettes sold to Indian retailers.

"We will now begin the implementation phase as we move to collect these taxes," said Cuomo, whose new budget projects more than $100 million in revenues from collections.

"I have always said that taxes on cigarettes sold to nontribal members must be collected because this is revenue rightly owed to the state, and with this decision, my administration will move to do so expeditiously."

The ruling will enable the state to collect about $500,000 a day from Indian retailers, Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman said.

The Seneca Nation of Indians vows to keep resisting the effort to collect the taxes.

"We will continue fighting against this overreaching action by the state to protect our treaty rights, tobacco commerce and all the jobs it supports," Seneca President Robert Odawi Porter said. "The Seneca Nation will not be New York State's tax collector."

State officials have wanted to tax Indian tobacco sales since the 1980s but have held off because of a combination of court rulings and fears that a tax crackdown would spark violence on Indian reservations.

"Today's decision respects tribal rights and at the same time represents an important victory for the state to collect deserved revenue and to protect public health," Schneiderman said. "The decision closes an enormous tax-evasion loophole that was depriving New York of hundreds of millions of dollars in tax revenue."

In its 53-page opinion, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, based in New York City, said U.S. District Judge Richard J. Arcara of Buffalo ruled correctly last October when he denied a request by the Seneca Nation and other Indian tribes for an injunction against the state.

Lawyers for the Indian tribes asked Arcara to issue a preliminary injunction banning the state from taxing on-reservation cigarette sales from Indian-owned businesses to non-Indian customers.

Arcara refused, and he was right, the appeals court stated.

Indian tribes contend that the state's efforts would violate the tribes' sovereign rights to govern themselves, but the appeals court -- based on past U.S. Supreme Court rulings -- turned aside that argument.

 "At this pre-enforcement stage, [Indian nations] have not demonstrated that they are likely to prevail on their claim that the amended tax law infringes tribal sovereignty or unduly burdens tribal retailers," the appeals court wrote.

Representatives for non-Native American retailers hailed the decision and said they believe that Cuomo will become the first governor to collect the taxes. "We think it's a victory for taxpayers and the fundamental principle of fairness," said James S. Calvin, executive director of the New York Association of Convenience Stores.

Calvin said he believes that one or more Indian tribes may try to press the matter to the U.S. Supreme Court.

but noted that the court Monday repeatedly referenced the 1994 case involving a Buffalo tobacco wholesaler that first authorized the state to collect the tax on cigarette sales by Indian retailers to non-Indians.

While Porter did not give specifics on how the Senecas plan to fight state tax collections, Seneca leaders have stated in the past that they would go all the way to the Supreme Court.

"We're going to meet with our lawyers, get their analysis of what this decision means and what the state plans to do, and go from there," said J.C. Seneca, of Irving, a major Seneca tobacco retailer and manufacturer who also serves on the Tribal Council. "We're never going to succumb to the state collecting taxes from us."

But if the state ultimately prevails in the courts, Seneca said, he and other Indian retailers may move to selling only Indian-made cigarettes, which he said are not subject to taxation.

He said he would like to stop selling major brands, such as Marlboro and Winston, altogether, and only sell cigarettes that his own Native Pride company makes.

"I'm a manufacturer, and that may be all we'll do someday -- sell native-made products," Seneca said. "I know the major brands have a following, but we're doing very well with our own brands."

Similar comments came late Monday from Mark F. Emery, a spokesman for the Oneida Indians, based in Verona, where they run the popular Turning Stone Casino. They, too, make their own cigarettes, which are cheaper than the major brands, and there is a big market for them, Emery said.

"The court's ruling against the tobacco distributors does not impact our ability to sell cigarettes at a reduced cost," the Oneida spokesman said.

Seneca said he does not foresee any violent reactions by Senecas against state officials if they try to collect the taxes. "It has been the state that has been aggressive, and the state that has brought violence to our territories," he said. "Not us."

In 1997, when the state tried to collect the tax, the Senecas shut down parts of the Thruway running through their territory.

 

tprecious@buffnews.com; dherbeck@buffnews.comnull

true

Comments

Sort:NEWEST FIRST | OLDEST FIRST

Mr. Schoene,

That is a very good point and it wouldn't surprise me in the least if the state attempted to levy some tax at the agricultural level. I think that it would be prudent if some of the existing tribal business people were to "diversify" their tobacco retail by not only growing tobacco on tribal territory, but by growing potent, old-world tobacco. This could be a unique way of marketing a product that more closely resembles tradition, but maybe even changes the dynamic of tobacco as it is interpreted. Similiar to Hookah bars selling flavored blends in effigy of Eastern traditions.

Of course it would be a novelty so the need to grow more commercial blends for cigarettes would have to be initiated. As for agricultural "space" on limited territories, indoor horticulture can be used to great effect.

I wonder what the state would do then?

JORDAN BALL, SALAMANCA, NY on Wed May 11, 2011 at 09:53 AM

The Native Americans who have been doing business in the tobacco industry, both by retail or making their product have taken many a family off the state welfare sysytem, which is paid for by TAXES. Now, the state government has deemed it neccesary to attempt to collect said "taxes" from the Native Americans. I am to think that the state wants the Native Americans dependent upon the state again, which will place many families back on the welfare system by taking away their jobs, or even their businesses. Which is the lesser evil? The Native Americans have to pay taxes at any local shops when purchasing clothing, food at the restaraunts, at the local movie theatres, and of course at the grocers. The convenience stores have been crying foul for years, when they know very well, that there are no liquor stores or beer sold on any of the territories. This surely makes up for the difference lost in "revenue" with the sale of tobacco. The Native community loves their football, their races, weddings, celebrations, their fun in the sun as well as anyone else, and the revenue goes where? Of course, to the local beer store or to the liquor store. It does not fall back on any retail shops or families within any of the tribes, it goes into the convenience stores or licenced liquor stores. Tobacco has been an indigineous product of the Native Americans before anyone "discovered" this country. Who was here first? Whose democracy was guidelined by the "founding fathers"? Supposedly this is a free country, but Albany sure screwed up these past years by not respecting any of the Indian treaties!

TRISH PATTERSON, PERRYSBURG, NY on Tue May 10, 2011 at 03:58 PM

This is funny to think that manufacturing the product on Indian land will stop the state. Next, they will charge the tobacco growers sending tobacco leaves to Indians. This is going to be interesting.
Andrew Cuomo is not a nice guy. The Indians are now pitted against a guy will make war on them if necessary.

GARY SCHOENE, WEST SENECA, NY on Tue May 10, 2011 at 12:28 PM

Mr Crowley:

The market for non-tribal cigarettes has been diminishing on the reservation so much over the course of the last ten years that at this point the name brands are only kept around for the very rare customer who insists on having them. This rare customer base, if removed, wouldn't impact the tribal tobacco industry much at all.

Also, as I pointed out in a previous post yesterday, the price increases on name brands are not entirely tax related. It works like this: the three major tobacco monopolies are working in concert to maximize their profits on a shrinking customer base. For the sake of PR they don't haggle with the state over tax increases but they do tend to imply that this is the reason their products cost more.

In fact they started gouging customers to such a degree that the tribal made products on the reservations became more appealing despite the tax free status. Increases of 100% and more occured without taxes, the base price for a carton of marlboros doubled and continue to escalate out of control without the taxes involved. In fact most of the price increase is established by the companies and not the taxes.

This is because when your customer base is shrinking your objective is to make the most money out of the least amount of people. With more people quitting you have to recoup that shortfall with price increases, and the state makes a great scapegoat.

I am all for non-tribal tobacco products being out of reservation stores. However it is going to be the market and not legislation that accomplishes this.

JORDAN BALL, SALAMANCA, NY on Tue May 10, 2011 at 10:47 AM

Walter: Well said! The lowering of the taxes on cigarettes would remove the incentive for some to drive the extra distance to a reservation, which would lead to increased sales at non-native stores.
Bill: I do have to take issue with your statement about the treaty. You are correct in stating that the treaty reads, "no taxes shall be levied upon the land", (Land meaning Indian Territory.)....and I agree with your inference to it's meaning. My problem with that argument is that the story (and the court ruling) clearly states the tax will be levied upon the wholesalers of the product. These wholesalers are non-native companies, haedquartered off native territory, shipping non-native goods. This tax has to date not been levied, yet the cost of non-native cigarettes are atleast twice those of native brands at reservation stores currently. To me that would suggest the reservation stores have been charging a 'tax' (purely profit) of their own to increase sales of their own goods while still keeping the price of non-native brands cheaper than 'regular' stores can. This is clearly unfair competition for sales of non-native goods, produced, packaged, and shipped by non-native companies, to reservation and non-native stores alike. If the tribal stores were receiving the goods at the same price as before, yet they were responsible for the collection of the state tax, the issue of sovereignty would be a valid one.

PAT CROWLEY, WEST SENECA, NY on Tue May 10, 2011 at 10:32 AM

Also keep in mind that the state is fighting with SNI over New York's violation of the exclusivity clauses of the gaming compact. Which is why the Seneca Nation has stopped paying a grotesque fraction of it's casino revenue to New York, a very modern example of immediately breaking contracts.

The projected windfall of these taxes is exaggerated in the first place, but when put into context alongside the size of Albany's fiscal straights it is laughable. Before the state violated the compact, which had stipulations allowing for the Seneca Nation to stop making payments if such a violation should occur, state and municipal governments had gotten about $475 million in "hand outs" from the gaming establishments.

All the while, even when getting the funds, this agenda against the tobacco taxation was never dropped. The state expected to get it's hundreds of millions in hand outs, break the compact it went into to get those millions, and continue to try to collect those last few pennies out of tobacco taxation.

It really is a shameless agenda.

JORDAN BALL, SALAMANCA, NY on Tue May 10, 2011 at 10:30 AM

Thanks Gov. You just opened up a whole new smuggling industry. Smuggling cigarettes is now as lucrative as smuggling drugs, but less dangerous to your freedom. Your greed is making out of countless otherwise honest people, criminals. On onw hand you want people to stop smoking on the other hand you are looking to make money of those who smoke. If smoking is such a health hazard that you are using taxes to force people to stop, why not tax McDonalds and all the other fast food outlets which cause us to gain all that unhealthy weight? There are more fat people out there then there are smokers. Just think about all the extra money you could make by taxing each Whopper $4,35. Then tax all the soft drink outlets and before long there will be no more people left in NYS, they will have all left to States where you still can be free.

HAROLD HAHN, BUFFALO, NY on Tue May 10, 2011 at 10:24 AM

This isn't an issue driven by health concerns or a credible budgetary goal. Nor is it legal contrary to a lot of the commentators here, many of whom don't have personal experience with the dynamics of the issue or it's history, and only know what they read in publications like this.

This tireless agenda serves a two pronged purpose. First of all this is corporatization of the government at it's finest. Big tobacco wants to cut out the growing competition from tribal made products and lobbyists for non-tribal convenience stores as well. So they pour their collective funds into the system hoping to gradualy chip away any threat to their oligarchies.

But there is an undertow of anti-indian sentiment, often glorified as an earnest need for "equality" against what is seen as a kind of "welfare handout" to tribal nations. According to this line of thinking we have become an "equal" nation so long ago that it is high time we disband tribal autonomy. This is especially appealing to people who think its a brilliant coup to point out that state aid programs are used by tribes, even when in most cases those affiliations have been historically forced. For instance, during the New Deal era, under the idealic commission of Collier, aid programs of all sorts were literally pushed on an unwanting network of NY tribes.

I could go on but they have limitations on how much you can write here. Suffice to say that the more informed you become about the issue, and I have looked extensively at both sides of the debate, the more obvious it becomes that the state and it's pupeteers are in grevious error. Their whole rhetoric is historically ignorant, and transparently partisan towards existing monopolies.

JORDAN BALL, SALAMANCA, NY on Tue May 10, 2011 at 10:13 AM

The State doesn't understand the basic principles of business or they would lower the current taxes on cigarettes instead of breaking Indian treaties. Local non-Indian sales would increase and the Indian cigarette sales would decrease. They have over priced the product through sales tax increases to the point where smokers are willing to spend more time and fuel just to get a lower price. Lowering the State cigarette tax would benefit local retailers by not only selling more cigarettes, it would also increase their sales on other products they offer in their stores.

WALTER REEVES, WEST SENECA, NY on Tue May 10, 2011 at 09:43 AM

Its about time!!! This business does not create jobs...it addicts young people to an unhealthy lifestyle. This business slowly kills its addicted customers. The rest of society pays for their increased health care costs. Drive through Salamanca.. see all the young people already addicted because the smokes are so cheap!!!!

ROB LANZA, ELLICOTTVILLE, NY on Tue May 10, 2011 at 09:32 AM

1 2 3
Add your comment

The Feed / What’s Happening Now

Latest Updates
Most Commented
Most Viewed
City of Buffalo

Ex-Bill Losman selling his Oakland Place home

Sabres & NHL

Sabres, Roy making their points

Courts

Corasanti's attorneys argue for dismissal

Lancaster

Lancaster union chief blasts head of NYSUT

Erie County

Sheriff's takeover of transit police eyed

Bucky Gleason

Boyes tries old routine to end slump

West Seneca

Couple lauded for a lifetime of love

Cheektowaga

Arrest made in Watkins' shooting death

Sabres & NHL

Miller remains sharp between the pipes

Niagara Falls

New company to run Maid of the Mist in Canada

Newsroom Tips

Have a news tip you think The Buffalo News should investigate?

Call The News tip line at 849-4475 or email us at investigations@buffnews.com.

All calls and emails will be kept confidential.

Buffalo Marketplace

Marketplace videos

Watch the latest offers, products and services from our advertisers.

Browse our print ads

It's the ultimate advantage for Buffalo consumers. Never miss another ad again!

Buffalo Savers: coupons

Buffalo coupons at your fingertips.
Just click and print. It's Easy!

close

Browse our print adsclose

Special Sections

Buffalo Saversclose

Local coupons

Featured coupon

Latest Blogs

Sports, Ink

This Day in Buffalo Sports History: The Boogie Man

SulliView

Reporter Marie Colvin died heroically, staying 'one more day' in a Syria under siege

BillBoard

'Mouse' McNally hired as Bengals consultant

Campus Watch

Ohio-UB live blog

Gusto

Remembering actor Neil Garvey