The wind industry has gone to great lengths over the years to snap up the best properties for its farms, often looking to remote swaths of prairie or distant mountain ridges to maximize energy production and minimize community opposition.
Now, it is reaching for the sky.
With new technology allowing developers to build taller machines spinning longer blades, the industry has been able to produce more power at lower cost by capturing the faster winds that blow at higher elevations. This has opened up new territories, in places like Michigan, Ohio and Indiana, where the price of power from turbines built 300 to 400 feet above the ground can now compete with conventional sources like coal.
And some communities, like the Town of Allegany in Cattaraugus County, don’t want the traditional windmill towers and fight them in court.
So efforts to capture the wind could go even higher. In perhaps the most extreme example, a startup called Altaeros Energies is preparing to introduce its first commercial pilot of an airborne wind turbine in Alaska.
Known as the BAT – or Buoyant Airborne Turbine – the enormous, white helium-filled doughnut surrounding a rotor will float about 1,000 feet in the air and feed enough electricity to power more than a dozen homes through one of the cables tethering it to the ground.
But the skyward expansion has already taken flight throughout the wind industry, transforming parts of the Midwest once shunned into wind powerhouses.
Six years ago there, the wind speeds at 200 feet were not strong enough to make wind development make sense, said Elizabeth Salerno, chief economist and director of industry data and analysis at the American Wind Energy Association, the industry’s main trade group. But as turbine hubs – which sit atop the towers – have risen above 200 feet and included longer blades, that has changed.
In Michigan, for example, there were no utility-scale wind farms operating in 2008, Salerno said. Now, there are enough to produce 1,000 megawatts of electricity, which could power hundreds of thousands of homes.
Prices have fallen so low – in some cases to about 4 cents per kilowatt-hour – that utilities have been increasing the amount of wind energy they want to buy through long-term contracts, with regulators saying it is their cheapest option. At the same time, though, the push has spurred some opposition in these new areas from residents who object to the tall, industrial wind turbines.
“It’s not just more wind in the windy places that we already know about,” Salerno said. “It’s opening up, potentially, regions like the Southeast or others where maybe it’s not quite economic today but it could be in the future. That’s where we’re headed.”
Airborne wind takes that dynamic even further, though for now it can compete only in places where the price of other options, like diesel, is much higher.
In Alaska – as in other remote regions, representing a multibillion-dollar market Altaeros hopes to tap – energy costs run so high that even a promising but largely unproven technology is cost-effective, officials say.
“Particularly for Alaska, eliminating the costs that are associated with power installation,” said Alan Baldivieso, program manager for hydrokinetics, geothermal and emerging energy at the Alaska Energy Authority, “makes this type of deployment very attractive.”
The authority awarded Altaeros a $1.3 million grant from its Emerging Energy Technology Fund to support testing the equipment over 18 months with the idea of expanding its use.
“Our biggest focus is on cost just because it’s so, so expensive in parts of Alaska,” said Sean Skaling, deputy director of alternative energy at the authority. “A nice byproduct is that it’s also typically greener and cleaner if it’s less expensive.”
Ben Glass, chief executive of Altaeros, said he expected the company to be able to offer power at about 18 cents per kilowatt-hour, far too high for most conventional markets but still well below the 35 cents a kilowatt-hour often paid in remote areas of Alaska.
In parts of Alaska, prices can reach about $1 per kilowatt-hour, roughly 10 times the national average. Serving markets like that could help the company establish its business and lower costs to eventually compete for larger-scale projects.
Borrowing from the technology of blimps used to hoist communications, surveillance and weather monitoring equipment high above the earth, the Altaeros system is able to adjust the turbine’s height and alignment in response to changing winds to maximize power production. That allows the machine to produce anywhere from two to three times as much electricity as its conventional tower-mounted counterparts, Glass said.
The company has raised more than $1 million in the past two years from angel investors and some state governments as well as the federal government, including the Energy and Agriculture departments. The technology could help provide power after natural disasters.
In the long term, executives say they hope to expand into the offshore market, particularly places like the Pacific Coast, where officials recently approved plans to test floating turbine platforms because the waters are too deep to sink conventional foundations and towers into the seabed.
But that is years away. For now, the team is focused on flying as many balloons as it can in areas that lack electricity or are dependent on expensive diesel fuel.